Definition:
Most all major Specification-Defects are found in Implementable-Specifications.
But not all Defects in Implementable-Specifications are major
Concept Number: *294
English Master: Implementable-Specification
Synonyms, Variations & Acronyms: none
Detailing
By definition, Major-Defects are far less likely to be found in “background”
specification. But they are possibly there depending on how individuals specify.
Illustrations
Illustration: none
Type
none
Examples
none
Notes
1. Implementable sections of a specification can be called “meat” and, Background sections can be called “fat”
{typically – but not necessarily - Notes, comments, remarks, Background, summary, introduction, references, rationale}.
2. Checkers in SQC should concentrate on carrying out rigorous Checking, at Optimum-Checking-Rates on
the Implementable-Specifications. This gives better Efficiency in finding Major-Defects
3. When the visual distinction is made, and it is clear what is Background and not; then Quality-Control
Checkers can more easily, and more certainly, decide which Defects are major and which are not.
If the Defects are found in Background they are most likely minor. If found in Implementable-Specifications, they are possibly major.
4. Parameters are fairly clearly either Implementable-Specifications (Scale, Goal) or Background
(Headline, Gist, Past) if you think about it. But local judgment must always be applied to decide if a specification is potentially major or not.
Keyed-Icons
none
Drawn-Icons
none
Related-Concepts
none
History-of-Concept
none
This Concept entered by Soheir.
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}